Vehicle taxation: act to avoid £5 billion black hole, charity urges Chancellor

3 September 2024

Silviya Barrett of Campaign for Better Transport said: 

 “The new Chancellor faces a looming black hole. She can avoid it, in a way which is fair, and which garners broad public support. But she should start now, as this issue will only get more pressing.” 

The easiest immediate solution, the letter says, would be a simple charge levied on zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) on a per-mile basis. Having an adequate transition period would enable industry to prepare. And exempting existing ZEV drivers would incentivise uptake before the implementation date. 

“It should be cheaper to drive a zero-emission vehicle than a more polluting vehicle, but it’s only fair that these drivers should pay a share, and a pay-as-you-drive model can achieve this,” Ms Barrett said. 

Research by Campaign for Better Transport showed that 65 per cent of the public believe it is fair for ZEV drivers to be taxed but at a lower rate than petrol and diesel drivers versus only 19 per cent who disagree. 

Campaign for Better Transport leads a Pay-as-you-drive Forum, which comprises 37 organisations including transport industry and sector bodies, NGOs and think tanks. While different members of the Forum have slightly different perspectives, all would support a Treasury move on vehicle taxation, believing it is important that ZEV drivers should fairly contribute. 

ADEPT President, Ann Carruthers, said: “As we transition to a decarbonised transport system, it’s crucial that we address the funding gap created by declining fuel duty revenues. 

“A well designed, pay-as-you-drive system would provide both a sustainable funding source for our vital road infrastructure and also encourage the shift towards greener travel choices that are crucial for our net zero ambitions.”  

RAC head of policy Simon Williams said: “With fuel duty revenue set to fall further as more electric vehicles come on to the road, a replacement form of taxation needs to be introduced to avoid losing billions.  

“Our research suggests drivers broadly support the principle of ‘the more you drive, the more tax you should pay’. Whatever any new taxation system looks like, the most important thing is that it’s simple and fair to drivers of both conventional and electric vehicles. A pay-per-mile system could be set up according to vehicles’ emissions with EV drivers paying the least to further encourage take-up and ‘gas guzzlers’ paying the most. We’re not in favour of charging different amounts per mile based on the type of road driven on.  

“We believe the Treasury needs to get moving on creating this new system sooner rather than later.”  

Alison Edwards, Director of Policy and External Relations at forum member the Confederation of Passenger Transport said: “Bus and coach operators recognise that for the UK to meet its net zero carbon targets many more people must be persuaded to use public transport more often. The introduction of pay-as-you-go vehicle taxation could support this shift by balancing pricing between modes. This would help curb congestion – something that will in turn make buses and coaches quicker, more reliable and so more attractive.” 

ENDS 

For further information or to request an interview, please contact the press office on 07984 773 468 (calls only no texts) or communications@bettertransport.org.uk 

Notes to Editors 

1.Read Campaign for Better Transport’s letter to the Chancellor. 

2.RAC Foundation estimates that annual fuel duty income from cars will decline by £5 billion – the equivalent of the funding spent on England’s motorways and major A-roads each year – between 2028 and 2033. 

3.Campaign for Better Transport’s 2022 report, Pay-as-you-drive: the British public’s views on vehicle taxation reform, was based on the results of four focus groups and a detailed 60-question survey of over 3,000 adults from across the UK. 

• Sixty per cent of people agreed there is a need to reform the current system of vehicle taxation, versus six per cent who disagreed 

• Sixty-five per cent believed it is fair for EV drivers to be taxed but at a lower rate than petrol and diesel drivers so as not to slow down their uptake, versus 19 per cent who disagreed 
• Forty-nine per cent supported the idea of pay-as-you-drive, after arguments for and against were discussed, while only 18 per cent opposed it. 

4. Research completed by WPI Economics shows that if everyone switched just two car journeys a month to the bus or coach, by 2050 the UK could have saved 19.5 million tons of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere.   

 5. Campaign for Better Transport leads a Pay-as-you-drive Forum. Members include: 

• Adam Smith Institute 
• ADEPT 
• Arup 
• BusinessLDN 
• Centre for London 
• Centre for Policy Studies 
• Chartered Institution of Highways & Transportation (CIHT) 
• CPT UK 
• Cycling UK 
• Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU) 
• EVA England 
• Fern Consulting 
• Foundation for Integrated Transport 
• Green Alliance 
• Greenpeace UK 
• Intelligent Transport Systems UK (ITS UK) 
• Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) 
• Local Government Association 
• Logistics UK 
• London Cycling Campaign 
• Motorcycle Action Group 
• PA Consulting 
• Possible 
• RAC 
• RAC Foundation 
• Social Market Foundation 
• Transport Action Network 
• Transport for Quality of Life 
• Transport Planning Society 
• WPI Economics 
• Zemo Partnership 

6. Campaign for Better Transport operates in England and Wales. Campaign for Better Transport’s vision is for all communities to have access to high quality, sustainable transport that meets their needs, improves quality of life and protects the environment. Campaign for Better Transport Charitable Trust is a registered charity (1101929).